rosie wrote:
It's because people can't believe that yes, women can indeed rape men.
That and it seems like an unlikely story that a man should not protect himself against a stripper. I guess the court did not understand that even the chick coming up from behind him and penetrating him, bumpin' a few times while he's still shocked and walkin' away is still as much rape as the opposite. That was probably their mentality, "Hey wild party, he was probably drunk, if he did not want it, or it was on purpose he probably would have fought her off."
Typical. I do pity the man.