Forkheads http://www.forkheads.net/ |
|
Incest http://www.forkheads.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=667 |
Page 3 of 6 |
Author: | Haz [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
meh I think it's the peoples choice to who they have sex with |
Author: | Pantsman [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Lime wrote: well i fully support it (see yomtoxic) j00 talkin' about meh? --- Been there, done that. The simplest explanation is true here. "Shit happens." |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Pfft, look at Kentucky. Toothess, Mountain Dew drinkin, inbred dumbfucks. Or, if that's not enough, look at the English and their ugly ass features. |
Author: | Pantsman [ Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
psychokittyboy wrote: Pfft, look at Kentucky. Toothess, Mountain Dew drinkin, inbred dumbfucks. Or, if that's not enough, look at the English and their ugly ass features. Hey, you need them crazy dumbfucks for the army. And KFC production. Speaking of the English, I suppose you saw Shocksock IRL?. |
Author: | Shocksock [ Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Only the Royal Family inbreed. Most normal people are stupid of their own account incest has nohing to do with it. |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Shocksock wrote: Only the Royal Family inbreed. Most normal people are stupid of their own account incest has nohing to do with it. Your people lived on an island for 2,000 years with minimal new genestocks being brought in... that's incest son. |
Author: | Haz [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
coming from a creationist coming from a creationist |
Author: | Shocksock [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
psychokittyboy wrote: Shocksock wrote: Only the Royal Family inbreed. Most normal people are stupid of their own account incest has nohing to do with it. Your people lived on an island for 2,000 years with minimal new genestocks being brought in... that's incest son. That was cousin marriges to keep land and power within familes. Also that might be why British aint posh anymoe (even tho in every American Media British dudes always speak posh). |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Haz wrote: coming from a creationist coming from a creationist 1. There is more than one creation story in Christian-Juedo Myth. 2. You may have a point, but that would still be a long time ago and allow for genetic anomolies. |
Author: | Haz [ Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
You pkb thats the 1st time you have ever said "you may have a point" to me anyway as I said earlier who cares its their life they can fuck who ever they wish |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
You're just angry cause you didn't think of it first. |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Author: | Haz [ Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
I see and the red neck area that you live in is certainly not Libel to inbreeding is it pkb ^.^ |
Author: | psychokittyboy [ Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
Texas isn't known for its inbreeding, as I pointed out earlier. Maybe along the Louisina border, but that's about it. Ain't like the Hills of West Kentucky. |
Author: | Haz [ Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Incest |
it is not anyway I was merely using sterotypes as a joke fool boys |
Page 3 of 6 | Time zone: Pacific/Galapagos |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |