Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
 The Electoral College of the USA Explained for Dumb Fucks 
Author Message
Level 22
Level 22
User avatar

Cash on hand:
174,929.20
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:10 am
Location: SR388
Group: Special Access
Post The Electoral College of the USA Explained for Dumb Fucks
So we have alot of dumb fucks out there rioting and demanding the electoral college to elect hillary instead of trump because the popular vote was in favour of hillary clinton, this has people questioning the validity of the electoral college and calling it undemocratic, they have begun requesting it's removal from the voting system.

all this means is that ignorance abounds, because everyone went to school and heard why there is an electoral college, but they all completely forgot.

The electoral college grants states a set number of electoral votes, these votes number is not based on populous, but rather contribution to the infrastructure of the country that makes shit run.

in short, the number of electoral votes a state has is based on it's ability to put food on your plate, clothes on your back, materials for houses, tables, chairs, wiring, computer chips, plastic, paper etc. and that particular state's ability to generate value on an international scale.

Obviously we can't do everything in the big cities, there needs to be infrastructure to feed clothe and supply necessities for all those millions of people and the city just doesn't have those resources.

So, we need small towns, factories, farms, mines and lots of careful scientific oversight and knowledge.

And these companies need certain government allowances for them to operate with due efficiency. these allowances are called "the backbone", "The Bottom Line" and many other well deserved names.

however, business in a big city or heavily populous area requires a much more relaxed bottom line, in fact their bottom line can be rethought and replaced on a whim. They make Luxuries, Services and tacos and burgers. Democrat candidates live in this environment, they are all about wellfare, people first and wallstreet, that's the nation to them.

But as illustrated, what works for businesses in a large city doesn't necessarily work for the infrastructure of the country.

wellfare: it'd be nice if our employers paid for our healthcare, and obamacare as an example requires any business with more than 30 employees or with employees that work more than 30 hours a week to pay for those employees health insurance. when you have a company making millions off designer bags and you have 2000 staff that is easily affordable. but if you are a factory with 1000 workers making nike shoes and you'd be lucky to make 5 million a year gross profit, you honestly can't fork out the extra dough. So you hand out pink slips, do mass layoffs and open a plant in India or China. then your product becomes an import which creates a deficit that the remainder of the country needs to compensate for.

people first: kinda nice to have civil liberties, you can do what you like with yourself and demand acceptance no matter where you go or what you're doing. and that works in cities and high populous areas because you aren't really responsible for operating dangerous machinery or supplying clean product for consumption. but the infrastructure of the country can't have things like people coming in to work stoned or drunk, they just legally can't operate the machinery in that state because they could hurt themselves or others or accidentally put razors in candybars or break a multi million dollar machine, or kill a fucker. not only that, a factory environment needs to have worker cooperation without any awkward disagreements, once you instate civil rights to force your life on others suddenly you have people who just can't morally work with you, and that hurts the bottom line of production quantity and quality.

So where is this infrastructure? it occupies the majority of the land area of the country.

and the electoral college bases each state's vote on this fact. why? because, if your country's infrastructure can't vote because they lack a populous majority, then policies and programs and political institutions will make demands as per what big cities and big cities alone want, and that may cause the infrastructure to crash.

if the infrastructure crashes, all your supply comes from other countries and it becomes an international gambling game of laundering money through currencies and companies (which is a losing game which creates debt and lowers the value of your currency forcing you to work harder to get the same things), which means that you don't actually make anything that your country needs to survive. It's why democrats are so intensely focused on making a global market, because it's the only way they can get by without caring about their own country's infrastructure (and only for a short time), otherwise everyone in those big cities would be starving and homeless in rags with nothing to their name except broken worn-out junk.

This is the fate that the electoral college helps us avoid. The electoral college gives the infrastructure and those that are working in the infrastructure a voice in an otherwise hopeless government bureaucracy which is far slanted towards people with less needs.




Summary: The electoral college makes sure that you don't accidentally cut off your fucking food supply you whiny ho!

_________________
mepsipax

Image

got any?

His name is not Robert Paulsen, His name is Gregory Matthew Bruni, he won so hard.

_________________
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.


Tue Nov 15, 2016 7:41 am
Profile E-mail
Level 22
Level 22
User avatar

Cash on hand:
174,929.20
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:10 am
Location: SR388
Group: Special Access
Post Re: The Electoral College of the USA Explained for Dumb Fuck
And now another explanation that needs to be made:

Official Legal Concessions

Jill Stien believes she can demand a recount in swing states and swing the electoral vote for Clinton.

To concede: to drop out, to forfeit, to accept loss, to forgo the privileges and benefits of what you conceded about.

Clinton officially conceded to trump on november 9nth.

so what does it mean?

because she conceded, she closed the race. she gave up her right to challenge the swing state votes or any votes for that matter. In actual fact at the time of concession Clinton 'waived' all votes she did earn. she dismissed them plain and simple. at this point she has officially dropped out of the race and cannot be awarded electoral votes unless she re-registers (but the registration deadline is well past, so it's impossible for her to register for this election legally).

She's out, she's done, Gaim Ovar, insert credits to start over after 4 years, you cannot continue from last save it has been erased at your request.

thats where Hillary is, so even if there were some last second votes that swung the election for hillary before december, or even if a recount shows hillary winning, she can't legally be awarded or accept the office of president because she conceded.

In fact because of her concession Trump has begun the transition process into the presidency, this process cannot be halted by law due to national security concerns. If she had not conceded till the last mail in ballots were recorded she and only she could have demanded a recount in her favor, AND as a result Trump would not have been allowed to begin the transition process till all votes were counted, and only if he actually won the electorate after that. but because she conceded the next morning, Trump became the official president elect. Once that title is granted there's no going back to recount.

there is one exception. any candidate who did not formally concede may request a recount ON THEIR BEHALF. what that means is that Jill Stien cannot Swing the election for anyone but Jill Stien, trump or any other politician formally still in the race, in other words she can only swing the race for someone who did not concede already.

_________________
mepsipax

Image

got any?

His name is not Robert Paulsen, His name is Gregory Matthew Bruni, he won so hard.

_________________
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.
Click the icon to see the image in fullscreen mode  
1 pcs.


Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:54 pm
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 
 

Similar topics

 
jesus christ are people really this dumb?
Forum: ./General Spam
Author: cluelessfurball
Replies: 8
Haven't done that since college...
Forum: ./General Spam
Author: Dark Jester
Replies: 2
World War II for dumb asses and lazy bastards
Forum: ./General Spam
Author: Hakurei no Miko
Replies: 4
Because You Fucks Dont Stop Bitching
Forum: ./General Spam
Author: Shocksock
Replies: 31
Why Hello there sick fucks
Forum: ./General Spam
Author: EmoVan
Replies: 25
Top


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Mods Database :: Imprint :: Crawler Feeds :: Reset blocks
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.

Portal XL 5.0 ~ Premod 0.3 phpBB SEO