Alright, I'll go first, was just waiting for a good slosh article based on pseudoscience to be illustrative.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/massive-expl ... 16166.htmlHeadline: I B T author David Coward makes unfounded baseless claims; "GRB of unknown origin was caused by the formation of a black hole"
content:
Even after researchers gathered all the data they had, at the end of the data chain only a few things were clear;
1: a GRB happened in space that created a pillar of light visible from earth.
2: The red spectrum rule was violated to claim that light from said GRB could reach earth from billions of light years away.
What still remains unknown is the exact source of this GRB event, David Coward of the International Business Times openly judged the event and proclaimed it was from the collapse of a super massive star while it became a black hole some billion years ago near the beginning of the universe. David Coward gave no evidence to support his claim other than former unproved scientific guesswork of what could (in their understanding) create these events.
David went on to link this event to LIGO's experiment which claimed to have detected gravity waves because their lasers bent due to some unknown force and subsequently created a slowed return in the light to the emitter. David said that the black hole created billions of years ago will probably eventually collide with another black hole and create gravity waves.
The Laser bend experiment has flaws, not only is it very sensitive to vibrations of any type, but also that an electromagnetic field could in fact create the same proposed outcome as what was observed and is postulated to be the same as what gravity is said to do in those instances. the difference however is that electromagnetism can be seen as a force particle when splitting atoms, in fact it is very common. where as gravity has never, not even once been observed as a subatomic particle or field. there has never been physical evidence that the interaction we call gravity is in fact it's own force. So for LIGO to merely jump at the find that something hit their laser beam and not rule out electromagnetism means their outcome was biased, and their experiment was flawed from the start.
In addition, back to a combination of David and LIGO's claims, technically any explosion in space should produce gravity waves if light was able to escape the source. In this case LIGO should have received such gravity waves around the same time as the light burst, however nothing was reported. A lack of a reconfirmation further disqualifies LIGO's claims. and without proven gravity, it also puts the source of this explosion and light into question as current understandings of star collapses are based on gravity theory. If gravity doesn't in fact exist as it's own force then the interactions they presume will be incorrect and thus the source they predict will also be incorrect.
This article has been fact checked, it contained two truthful data reports, but quantified and qualified those data reports based on flawed research to produce a suggested outcome which is little more than opinion.