Having fun you two?

_________________

Eh I find the constant rectifying/explanation of mistakes a little boring. If everything I found wrong was really not what it seemed to be,there would probably be stuff I missed. Also the constant insulting me is getting boring. overall she's got good arguments, and an interesting style but her need to be right and not have mistakes is wearing thin. Still I can't go psycho and Yell at her because she's only doing this to prove herself right and me wrong. And I don't feel like IP hacking and messing with her directly. Boorrriinnngg.

I don't recall any quote of this sort, and if it was there, it was unimportant. The point is: There are certain things that are not right. It is not fucking right to let a person call someone immoral for being homosexual. What's annoying is your subjectivism.

I wish Wammy wasn't so damn intent on being right. There's so many good arguments and exploration to be had. She has ideas and stuff, but her biases are keeping her down. She needs to look at it from other perspectives and explore possibilites. It might not lead her to change her mind but at least be more accepting. She seems like a focused serious person who gets ticked off by holes in her argument. Her humour is even logical. She's like young me, before depression, and social/emotional response self training.

I think other than that flaw she's got enough nice points to be an exemplary person. Actually in that respect, she can be the closest thing to a true fuckhead here. Her dominance would eventually bound on her persistence and get her far on this site. Her need for knowledge and Intellectual pursuit may ruin that though.
Still minus that interesting possibilities. Two wammys would always agree with each other until the point one would make a mistake and then they'd fight to the death over it. Interesting idea. Yeah only one Wammy can exist.

First of all: I don't like being talked about in third person. Second of all, I'm not a child. You do not know me. I am pretty sure I am not a younger version of you. Your thought process is utter bullshit.

What I simply said: "It is not right to let a person call someone immoral for being homosexual. And that in a completely objective sense."

What you're implying is: "Lol herp derp, I's all subjective yo. You only think it's wrong. But that's, like, your opinion."

As for my "humor", well uh, there's no point in trying to be serious when you're talking to someone who obviously doesn't have the required common sense to logically analyze a sentiment and develop personal opinions upon it based on a moderate, if subjective, sense of right and wrong, or in between. Yes there is a such thing as morally neutral, but not everything fits into this category. You're just joking yourself. You are not some God-like being that you can stand above everyone, looking down and judging things without emotion. That's not how it works. Intelligence =/= being emotionless and without opinion.

First of all, I find it hilarious even after quoting, and seeing the quote and responding to it that you now ignore it and call it unimportant. On top of that your opinion of my lack of belief in things is really unimportant. It's my belief regardless.

On the next post I'm talking about your logical personality. I doubt you are a younger me. Seriously I was kind of stupid back then, and you don't seem the type. I think you're as logical as I was, before all the shit I went through.
You are not a child and I would never call you that.
I have a right to talk about you in third person. sue me.
I don't know you I just know the way you act.

I never insulted your stance on homosexuality.
I took offense to the fact you insulted my belief.

So the fact you're still saying I EVER insinuated your belief was wrong because it was just an opinion is a ridiculous statement. Also Making it sound like the dude from the big lebowski is even more ridiculous.

Subjectivism is just another way to look at the world. I examine it deeper than that, but keep that above as my true belief. I don't truly believe in anything. I base my life and knowledge around how life works, but beyond that I really don't know, and I'm not making absolutes.

On your humour you just tend to look at in in a logical light. I don't think you're non emotional. I think the fact that you're even getting angry and insulting me is emotional. It's an emotional response to a challenge of intellect. I just think you chose humour based on intellect not emotion.

The fact that you don't think I can even comprehend your humour? That's Presumptuous, Condescending, and Idiotic. I Choose not to make true opinions. It's my choice, not my inability.

I don't think I can think without some semblance of emotion, others would have seen I have some in me. As I said I live with my beliefs above my standards and knowledge. This lets me have the best of both sides.

The fact that you keep insulting me, and take everything I say that's somewhat offensive and bitch about it or throw it away as unimportant if it makes sense? I find that a little repulsive.

After all the only reason we kept arguing is you chose to insult me in the first place, and then when I asked you about it you went on a rampage of me being Subjective. And now you're dismissing the whole originator as unimportant.

Now shut up and listen to me for a moment.

I choose my subjectivism based on my realization that nothing can be truly proved. I figured it out at a young age. The fact that I can live a normal life with choices means I can live underneath this. The fact that I am successful so far underlines it.

Every single comment you have about how much of an imbecile I am. How idiotic my beliefs are and how stupid I must be.

I have kept up with your conversation, picked out flaws you refuse to even acknowledge, stated numerous reasons for my feelings on each and every manner.

I have not insulted your own opinions, only your actions and what they denote.
I have not questioned your own beliefs as you have questioned mine.
I have not insulted you directly in the way you are or been presumptuous about your nature.
All my statements are backed up by what I know.
All are backed up by my feelings.
In light of all of this am I really as stupid as you say?
Am I really wrong for choosing not to believe?
Can you look at yourself and say that you've been as respectful as me?
Can you say you know me?
Can you say your comments leading up to this are unimportant?
Is my life choice that important to you that you have to keep insulting me?
Really?
Is that really true?

Now, lets get on another topic and have fun
My eyes hurt.

_________________

And this is how you make a big deal about everything:

A few insults did not hurt you. If this quoting bullshit happened, so it happened. I'll still say it's insignificant. I'm dropping all of that. Hell, I'll even say you win. You win in that aspect. The argument is yours. I insulted you, I was intolerable, I implied shit about your opinions without knowing them, etc. etc. Now sue me.

What I have a problem with is the subjectivism. It's not a realistic way to look at things. It annoys the shit out of me. That's the main reason I'm upset.

Havent I read this before elsewhere, guys, please, I dont wanna read anymore.

_________________

What? my post didn't go through? Whatever.

Mostly that It's impossible to keep subjectevism as a belief you use in daily life.

I live life by morals knowledge and stuff like normal people.
I live a normal life filled with people work and stuff.

I keep my subjectevism as a looming belief. Really questioning everything.

Also thanks for apologizing. I realized you were ticked off, but I didn't know it wasn't just me. I thought I was pissing you off over being wrong when it was really that my beliefs are weird and can't be applied to life. Thanks for the Clarification.

Guess what I found the file!

Yes it's not. I agree. You can't live life only believing subjectively.

That's why I hold them above my life. I don't live my life as if everything was a question. I research, and study, and work, and make friendships. I live like a normal person, and what else would I do.

I live by normal rules, morals, knowledge and beliefs.

only above all this is my subjectivism.

It's almost religion like, I believe in not believing, but I don't make it my life. I could but I won't.

My thoughts about afterlife: ETERNAL VOID BEING NAKED IN A SPACE OF NOTHING, CANT GRASP SHIT, NOTHING AROUND YOU AND BEING UNABLE TO FAP.

_________________

I believe you just die into nothingness, and cease to exist as you're a function of your brain.

Like sleeping eternally, would be nice.

_________________

not even, i believe that you becaome, just, nothing, just as you came out of nothing, its smiple then you think, but things can seize to exist, i had a big discussion about nothing-something cycles with someone else, also sick, you really dont have to read every topic, really,

also, this feels just like the old days of rampant argueing, oh, PKB and n0thin, i have found your heirs

_________________